AARON HASS, Ph.D.
As we saw with the conservative columnist,
our moral judgment is tossed about by
our needs and desires. We find ways to rationalize issues that are most
personally difficult. So, too, our moral outrage picks and chooses its targets.
We decide which subjects war-rant our focus and define our sense of moral rectitude accordingly.
However, we often deny our impulse to act morally by denying any personal
responsibility to alleviate the suffering at hand. Our conscience is assuaged
by our vague sense that others will provide assistance because the needs is so apparent.
If necessary to justify our inaction, we
may go further and deny any urgency or deservedness in the first place.
We all know there are children who go to
bad hungry, impoverished, and diseased. Yet we allow this suffering to continue while we
pursue comparatively frivolous (and often expensive) goals. To an outside
observer, we would seem indifferent, even cynical, about the misery of others.
But to ourselves, we must maintain a self-perception of benevolence.
So we cling to a belief in what
psychologists call "the just World Hypothesis." In order to make
sense of the environment and avoid the
anxiety-producing perception that the world operates on a random basis, we believe
that people get what they deserve. I want to believe that bad things happen to bad people and that,
because I am basically a good person, misfortune will not befall me as it does
to those less deserving. When we read about the rape of a woman in a parking lot
we think, "She shouldn't walked alone to her car at night."
When someone else is hurt, it threatens us . We therefore
believe that the hurt individual is a faulty person and deserves his misfortune.
When anyone runs into difficulties because of his own irresponsibility or
recklessness, it's up to the person to bail himself out. We say "we tend
to believe that people that they deserve, that phrase provides a double does of
justification for withholding help or sympathy to someone who we say is unworthy of it in the first
place.
We are particularly egregious in our misplaced
attributions when w personally harm another and have no concern about making
amends. It is in those situations that we dismiss any consideration of our own malevolence and
simply blame the victim.


